Andrew Carnegie :: essays research papers

Andrew Carnegie was non only an outstanding industrialist, but also a great philanthropist. In the excerpt from page 105, Carnegie is stating that an end to Individualism would result in a revolution non an evolution because it is changing hu spell nature itself, and at that place would be no way to know if it would even be a change for the better. This excerpt was one trying to convey a communist utopia a policy of working for the better of each other, not besides for the individual alone.This concept of ending Individualism and beginning one word form of people, is one that arises with each leader (especi eachy communist) trying to change a association during this period of history. I dont believe, however, that Andrew Carnegie was trying to become a leader or begin a revolution. He was strictly stating his opinions on wealth and in turn giving that wealth away. Carnegie was a human of many contradictions. He was the wealthiest human being of all time, and he was confident (p) of the value of poverty in developing character.In Carnegies later on life, I believe he had realized his selfishness with his wealth and felt the demand to give it away. In the excerpt, I feel he was assessing his own piazza of wealth and was trying to encourage the rest of mankind to not hold up the type of life he had experienced. He stated, it is a nobler ideal that man should labor, not for himself alone, but in and for a brotherhood of his fellows, and share with them all in common I sense that the reason he make this statement was to encourage mankind to give away their wealth and not hold it for their own possession. Carnegie felt that society should work together sooner of individually. In many ways I agree with his statement, but I dont feel that this is a feasible concept. Individualism is something I wouldnt want taken away from me because I wouldnt be able to have that constant desire to better myself.